The newly confirmed U.S. Division of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Sean Duffy issued a brand new order and memorandum on Jan. 29, 2025, outlining vital coverage shifts geared toward implementing a number of of the Trump Administration’s govt orders (EOs). These actions sign a broad rollback of regulatory initiatives from the prior administration and a renewed concentrate on financial evaluation and cost-benefit concerns in transportation coverage that take the brand new administration’s perspective. Beneath is a spotlight of key takeaways and potential implications for stakeholders.
Key Takeaways from the Memorandum
The memorandum, „Implementation of Govt Orders Addressing Vitality, Local weather Change, Variety, and Gender,“ which was despatched to secretarial officers and heads of working administrations, units forth the steps DOT will take to implement not less than 4 of the Trump Administration’s main govt orders:
- Preliminary Rescissions of Dangerous Govt Orders and Actions (EO 14148): This directive initiates a sweeping rollback of insurance policies enacted below the Biden Administration that the present administration deems to have been overly burdensome or counterproductive. It goals to get rid of federal insurance policies perceived as extreme regulatory overreach.
- Ending Radical and Wasteful Authorities DEI Applications and Preferencing (EO 14151): This order focuses on dismantling variety, fairness and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, stating that authorities applications mustn’t present preferential remedy primarily based on race, gender or identity-based standards.
- Unleashing American Vitality (EO 14154): Prioritizing vitality independence, this order is predicted to reverse insurance policies that restricted home vitality manufacturing, probably easing regulatory necessities for vitality infrastructure tasks.
- Defending Ladies From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Organic Fact to the Federal Authorities (EO 14168): This directive seeks to reaffirm gender distinctions primarily based on organic intercourse in federal coverage, which could have broad implications for applications and initiatives associated to gender identification.
Moreover, DOT has been tasked with rescinding, canceling and revoking all orders, guidelines, funding agreements and insurance policies enacted throughout the Biden Administration that reference matters reminiscent of local weather change, greenhouse fuel (GHG) emissions, racial fairness, gender identification, DEI objectives, environmental justice or the Justice40 Initiative.
DOT and its working administrations should determine and submit an inventory of all focused insurance policies to the secretary of transportation by Feb. 8, 2025. The Trump Administration plans to start its rescission course of by Feb. 18, 2025, or inside 10 days of a respective working administration’s submission, signaling a swift coverage transition.
Key Takeaways from the DOT Order on Financial Evaluation
The DOT Order, „Guaranteeing Reliance Upon Sound Financial Evaluation in Division of Transportation Insurance policies, Applications, and Actions,“ emphasizes that below the Trump Administration, DOT can be dedicated to rigorous financial evaluation in policymaking, significantly in grantmaking, lending and regulatory actions. That is described by the brand new administration as a shift to a standard cost-benefit method the place selections are primarily justified primarily based on financial effectivity somewhat than broader social or environmental concerns.
The Financial Threshold for Rulemaking: A Main Shift
A vital change on this Order is the heightened requirement for cost-benefit evaluation, even for laws and actions that don’t meet the standard financial threshold set by the Workplace of Info and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). Established below EO 12866 and elevated by the Biden Administration’s EO 14094, federal companies have been required to conduct a cost-benefit evaluation for guidelines which have an annual impact of $200 million or extra on the economic system. Whereas EO 12866 additionally mandates a much less detailed evaluation for guidelines beneath this threshold, DOT is now extending the rigorous cost-benefit normal to all grantmaking, lending, policymaking and rulemaking selections, no matter their financial magnitude.
Which means even when the financial impression of a cost-benefit evaluation falls beneath $200 million, the Trump Administration might deal with the regulation or exercise as if the financial impression have been above $200 million. This enlargement is important as a result of tasks beforehand in a position to proceed with out in depth financial justification will now be topic to stringent assessment. Federal funding can be more and more troublesome to acquire for initiatives that don’t produce clear, measurable monetary returns, significantly these specializing in environmental, fairness or social justice concerns.
By eliminating discretionary regulatory actions that lack clear financial justification, this transfer is prone to limit funding for tasks that emphasize environmental, social fairness or local weather change concerns with out measurable monetary returns.
Rules Governing DOT Insurance policies and Applications
There are a number of key ideas that may information DOT’s method to finishing up insurance policies and applications.
- Necessary Value-Profit Evaluation: Shifting ahead, all DOT policymaking, grantmaking and rulemaking actions have to be supported by a constructive cost-benefit evaluation. Which means tasks might want to show clear financial benefits earlier than receiving federal help, eliminating concerns that prioritize environmental or social justice components over monetary viability.
- Evaluate and Unilateral Modification of Present Agreements: A very consequential side of the Order is the directive for DOT to assessment and unilaterally amend the phrases and situations of current grant agreements, mortgage agreements and contracts the place legally permissible. Which means recipients of previous DOT funding might even see adjustments to the phrases below which their tasks have been initially permitted. Agreements initially made below earlier regulatory frameworks might now be topic to new financial analysis standards, which might impression ongoing tasks that relied on prior commitments.
- Return of Alternative Zones: Initiatives situated in native alternative zones are most popular candidates for DOT funding. Certified Alternative Zones have been designated below the earlier Trump Administration and added to the tax code by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Dec. 22, 2017. These zones have been designed to spur financial growth and job creation in distressed communities.
- Finish of Social Value of Carbon Calculations: The DOT will not use or think about the social value of carbon estimates in its analyses, arguing that such calculations have been overly speculative and burdensome on companies. The U.S. Environmental Safety Company (EPA) has been directed to difficulty new steerage on carbon value methodologies, probably resulting in vital adjustments in environmental impression assessments.
- Concentrate on Household and Group Influence: As an alternative of specializing in broader environmental and social fairness issues, DOT insurance policies will now prioritize impacts on households and native communities. Which means infrastructure tasks can be evaluated primarily based on components reminiscent of noise discount, water and soil high quality, and financial stability somewhat than local weather or fairness objectives. Communities with marriage and delivery charges greater than the nationwide common will obtain greater desire for awards.
- Restrictions on Federal Funding for Native Political Targets: DOT grants, loans and contracts should now serve a transparent federal curiosity and can’t be used to advance tasks that serve purely native political objectives. This might result in the defunding of initiatives that prioritize native political or social priorities over nationwide financial and infrastructure aims.
- Co-Funding and Purchase America Necessities: Shifting ahead, tasks should show robust native monetary dedication and cling to Purchase America provisions. DOT will even prioritize venture awards that embrace using user-pay modules. Federal funding will not be obtainable for tasks that depend on indefinite authorities help for future upkeep or enlargement.
- Compliance with Federal Immigration Enforcement: Communities are required to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement so as to qualify for DOT funding. A related effort was put forth by the Trump Administration in 2017 however was in the end rejected by the courts.
Implementation and Compliance Concerns
- DOT’s working administrations should difficulty steerage to implement the Order by way of a notice-and-comment course of, offering stakeholders with a chance to have interaction with the coverage adjustments.
- Notices of Funding Alternative (NOFOs), grant agreements and mortgage contracts have to be up to date to align with the Order’s necessities, making certain that each one new funding mechanisms adjust to the administration’s priorities.
- Present grant agreements and contracts can be reviewed and amended the place legally permissible, probably altering the phrases of beforehand permitted tasks. Some stakeholders might problem the legality of DOT to reopen signed grant agreements.
- DOT will submit a compliance report inside six months outlining progress on these initiatives, offering transparency on the implementation course of.
Potential Implications for Stakeholders
These sweeping adjustments could have vital implications for state and native governments, transportation companies, transportation business stakeholders and recipients of DOT funding:
- State and Native Governments: Entities that make the most of DOT funding should now align their tasks with new federal priorities, shifting away from climate- and equity-based initiatives towards financial and family-focused standards. DOT will prioritize tasks which might be funded by a user-based module reminiscent of native transportation taxes. This will require revising current plans and proposals.
- Transportation Business: Entities searching for DOT funding should be sure that their tasks emphasize monetary effectivity, cost-benefit outcomes and compliance with Purchase America provisions. Funding could also be much less accessible for tasks emphasizing sustainability or social fairness objectives.
- Environmental and Social Coverage Advocates: The rescission of local weather change and DEI-focused insurance policies represents a big shift in federal transportation coverage. Organizations that relied on these initiatives might face funding cuts or regulatory challenges as these applications are rolled again. A slight change within the narrative or messaging of a company’s priorities or pursuits could also be advantageous to securing federal funding and help.
Conclusion
The DOT Order and accompanying Memorandum mark a notable shift in federal transportation coverage, inserting a selected concentrate on financial evaluation and cost-benefit concerns. These adjustments will reshape how funding selections are made and the way transportation tasks align with federal priorities. Stakeholders ought to monitor forthcoming steerage to know how these changes might impression current and future initiatives. For additional info on how these developments might have an effect on your group, please contact Holland & Knight’s Transportation and Infrastructure Coverage Workforce.
Info contained on this alert is for the overall schooling and information of our readers. It isn’t designed to be, and shouldn’t be used as, the only real supply of knowledge when analyzing and resolving a authorized drawback, and it shouldn’t be substituted for authorized recommendation, which depends on a selected factual evaluation. Furthermore, the legal guidelines of every jurisdiction are totally different and are continuously altering. This info will not be supposed to create, and receipt of it doesn’t represent, an attorney-client relationship. When you have particular questions concerning a selected truth state of affairs, we urge you to seek the advice of the authors of this publication, your Holland & Knight consultant or different competent authorized counsel.
